The "Legend of Zelda," also called the "legend of the sleeping princess," begins with a great king who used the Triforce to maintain order. The king eventually died, and his prince inherited only part of the Triforce. Goaded by a court magician into finding the missing Triforce, the prince interrogates his sister, the first princess Zelda, who is rumored to have heard something about the Triforce from the king before he died. She refuses to disclose anything and so the magician in a fit of rage casts a sleeping spell on her. The magician is reported to have died on the spot once the spell was completed.

Greatly saddened by his sister's curse, the prince places her sleeping body in the North Palace on the northern continent and decrees that all future princesses are to be named Zelda. This supposedly sets the stage for future games by explaining why the name "Zelda" reappears so much throughout Hyrule's history.
In order to never forget this tragedy, and to keep the memory alive, coming generations of girls in the royal family were always to be named Zelda.
Originally, the secret Zelda knew about the Triforce was presumed to be the location of the Triforce of Courage which was hidden by the king in the Great Palace, where it remained until The Adventure of Link. This "Sleeping Zelda" story stood alone with the original NES titles as the whole of Zelda canon, and so there was no need to consider it in the surrounding context. When A Link to the Past was released on the SNES, the game was almost universally considered a prequel to the NES games, and so most people decided that that game's Zelda was the Sleeping Zelda featured in the Zelda II backstory. This placement stood unchallenged by much of the theorizing community for over twelve years despite having absolutely no evidence aside from the following quote:
The predecessors of Link and Zelda face monsters on the march when a menacing magician takes over the kingdom.
The only notable reference to the naming tradition appeared after those twelve years, and is not universally considered as such. It appears in The Wind Waker when the King of Red Lions, Daphnes, names Tetra as Princess Zelda when it is discovered that she is a princess. This is certainly at least a surface reference, but whether or not it is a canonically significant reference or a mere homage is unknown. If it is, that would mean the Zelda naming tradition predates the flood, which makes sense if we consider that Ocarina of Time was supposed to be the very first game in the series timeline, and thus would feature the "first generation Zelda."
The idea that Sleeping Zelda predates The Wind Waker is based on two facts: first, that the princess is referred to as "Zelda" in The Wind Waker purely by virtue of her being a princess, as if it is taken for granted that this will be her name; this suggests a naming tradition like the one in the Sleeping Zelda backstory; and also that the Sleeping Zelda is called the "first generation Zelda," which suggests that she is the very first princess to bear that name
The magician had heard something about the King telling only the Prince's younger sister, the first generation Princess Zelda, about the Triforce before he died.
Those who hold fast to A Link to the Past's placement as a prequel to The Legend of Zelda are also quick to discount the thought of the naming tradition originating pre-Wind Waker, or even after Ocarina of Time's Adult ending at all. However, given that the developers appear to have given it some attention in the post-flood world, we should at least consider how the tradition would fit in the pre-flood Hyrulean timeline.
Background for the theory: Relevant comparisons
On the Royal Family and the Triforce
Whereas the traditional interpretation of the Sleeping Zelda story holds that the king "using the Triforce" means he must physically possess it, this theory asserts that instead the king of Hyrule has the divine guidance of the Triforce.
The first inkling of a connection between the Royal Family and the Triforce lies in the status of the Triforce mark as the family's crest. Triforce marks appear all over the world of Ocarina of Time and latter games as a symbol of the Royal Family. This is probably the case because the Royal Family has a special link to the Triforce--they are the ones in charge of keeping the secret of its location, and their sages keep it in their custody.
But the connection may be more than just one by proxy. Look at this quote from the Royal Composer Brothers:
"We brothers also served the Royal Family, and were assigned to study the hereditary mystic powers of the family. Though we never could figure out the power of the Triforce, we had almost completed our study of controlling time with the tones of ocarinas."
Alongside their study of the power of music, the Composer Brothers tried to research the Triforce as one of the Royal Family's hereditary powers. This would suggest that the Triforce and the Royal Family's powers are connected, if not one and the same.
But how could the Royal Family use the Triforce if it is locked up in the Sacred Realm? One other game has touched on the idea of the Triforce's power guiding people from afar:
"The guidance of the Triforce has made you into this legendary hero!"
We know, of course, that Link does not physically hold the Triforce in Oracles--it is resting in Hyrule Castle. Elsewhere the power of the Triforce is described as "divine protection." And this guidance comes with a sign, a Triforce mark on the back of the chosen one's hand. We know the Triforce mark indicates worthiness of the Triforce in other games throughout the series, including, namely, The Adventure of Link, where the mark appears on the back of the hand of the one destined to unite the Triforce and become a great king--just like the Sleeping Zelda king.
On the concept of 分身
Agahnim is described in the Japanese version of A Link to the Past as a bunshin (分身) of Ganon's. The closest English words to this are "alter-ego" and "clone." In the Zelda series, the idea of a "bunshin" effectively means "soul split" or "replication." This same word is used in Phantom Hourglass to describe Ciela (bold is the transliterated Japanese, unbold is the Nintendo of America English localization):
OSHUS
力・知恵の精霊は その魔物たちに封印されたが
The spirits of Power and Wisdom were sealed by those monsters.
The spirits of Power and Wisdom were also imprisoned.
シエラは うまく分身して 逃げられたのじゃろう
But Shiera could escape by skillfully creating an alter ego ("bunshin").
But Ciela managed to split her soul and escape.
Since Ciela was able to escape imprisonment by creating an alter-ego, we can assume that Ganon was able to do the same in A Link to the Past to escape the Sages' Seal, thus creating Agahnim. Otherwise the game states that the Sages' Seal is impossible to "break" without the power of the sages, although we see Link travel between worlds with the aid of the Magic Mirror, so we know this not to mean that the seal is totally impassable.
On the Sages' Seal
Nowhere in the canon of The Wind Waker is the Sages' Seal from Ocarina of Time that shut the entrance to the Sacred Realm said or suggested to be destroyed. To the contrary, Ganondorf was said to have been "revived without reason" and the "seal of the gods" that sealed Ganondorf in Hyrule, is said to be broken (and confirmed to be intact later, with Ganondorf's means of escape being revealed as a portal he created).
The exact text, for reader analysis, is here:
He obtained the power of the gods, planned on transforming the world into a Makai of darkness, and was sealed by the power of the gods. The emperor of the Makai in the ancient legend is that Ganondorf. I do not know why the gods' seal has broken, but, now that he has been revived, the world has once again begun to be threatened by his evil magical powers.
If the Master Sword bound Ganon while he was imprisoned in the Sacred Realm then that seal might also qualify as the "seal of the gods" and was likely in fact broken.
The original early Sleeping Zelda theory
The "great ruler" who maintains peace in Hyrule must be the King of Hyrule who ruled in Ocarina of Time. This is not a bad assumption, given that Ocarina describes itself as taking place when "Hyrule was one kingdom," just as the Sleeping Zelda story does. The king is said to have "maintained peace in Hyrule using the Triforce," referring not to a literal possession and use of the Triforce but to his status as the protector of the land. By using his kingship, intimately tied to the Triforce, to unify the kingdom, the king "maintains peace in Hyrule" with the help of the Triforce, his divine guide.

The prince must be the next in line to the throne, which therefore means that Princess Zelda from Ocarina of Time has an older brother. He inherits the Triforce "in part," or as the Japanese text says, "incompletely." We know that the Triforce was divided at the end of Ocarina of Time, so it should come as no surprise that rather than inheriting custody of the entire Triforce, he only inherits "part." We see in The Wind Waker that the king does hold "part" of the Triforce--the shard of the Triforce of Wisdom. The "prince," then, could be either Daphnes or a predecessor of Daphnes.
The Sleeping Zelda story remains precisely as is, with this background context filling in the more vague parts of the tale, such as what "part" of the Triforce fell to the prince. We must assume in this scenario that this particular story does not feature the same king who hides the Triforce in the Great Temple before The Adventure of Link. In this theory, that king is either Daphnes (through his wish in The Wind Waker) or one of his successors. The theory currently being presented is an expansion on this original theory.
The Theory: Ganon is the villain of the Sleeping Zelda story
The Sleeping Zelda story features a villain: the magician responsible for the curse on the princess. This magician, as the text indicates, has a clear interest in the Triforce, has apparently used the royal family as a means of accessing the sacred relic, and is not above attacking the family members for information about its location. This description sounds rather like the descriptions of both Ganondorf's role in Ocarina of Time and that of Agahnim in A Link to the Past.
Since Ganondorf is a known criminal after Ocarina of Time, he cannot appear in his own likeness and rally the king's favor as the magician in the backstory seems to have. Additionally, Ganondorf is still trapped in the confines of the Sacred Realm by the Sages' Seal and his evil power remains bound by the Master Sword, so his only way out seems to be that he should create an alter-ego to escape.
These similarities seem suspicious, but nothing specific exists to link the magician to Ganon. Poring deeper into the The Wind Waker texts, however, we find this quote:
Do you sleep still? [...] I can see this girl's dreams...
Since Ganondorf can read Zelda's dreams, associating him with the magician from the Sleeping Zelda backstory sheds some insight as to why he cast a sleeping curse when she would not disclose information about the Triforce. Ganondorf intended to pry into her sleeping mind to ascertain the information by force. This is enough of an association to warrant a closer look at how the scenario might have functionally played out prior to The Wind Waker, with Ganon as the magician.
Before I
describe how I relate the events in detail, some preliminary
assumptions must be outlined. These assumptions, while never explicitly
evidenced in the actual texts, are derived from things we see either
in-game or in other games.Since Ganon was able to escape the Sages' Seal in A Link to the Past by soul-split, we can assume he was able escape the same seal in the same way in Ocarina of Time. However, one key difference between Ocarina Ganon and Link to the Past Ganon is that the former has the Triforce of Power in his hand and the latter used the Triforce to grant a wish. That is, the first Ganon has unlimited access to the Triforce of Power, whereas the second only had access to its power to grant a wish.
Thus, if Ganon can use his Triforce's power, he can create a portal to escape the Sages' Seal just as he did to escape the gods' seal. But the Master Sword was used to bind Ganon's power even after he was cast into the Sacred Realm, so in order to use the full measure of his powers he must first remove the sword's power to seal him.
The events themselves are a combination of those spoken of in Wind Waker's backstory and the Sleeping Zelda story, identifying an alter-ego of Ganon's as the magician and Daphnes as the prince. The Sages' Seal keeps the Sacred Realm entrances and exits locked so that they cannot be infiltrated, and the seal cannot be broken without the power of the sages. Ganondorf himself is bound by the Master Sword, which repels his evil power including that of the Triforce of Power and prevents him from using it to force his escape.
The Triforce of Courage was left behind by Link when he traveled through time and left Hyrule. The only one who knew what became of it was the King of Hyrule, the Great King spoken of in legend. Prior to the infiltration of the Sacred Realm, the King had maintained peace in Hyrule by unifying the kingdom and safeguarding the Triforce, the source of Hyrule's natural order.
When the Hero of Time was called to embark on another journey and left the land of Hyrule, he was separated from the elements that made him a hero.
Rather than attempting vainly to infiltrate the Sages' Seal by force, Ganondorf splits his soul and creates an alter-ego which is able to seep through the Sages' Seal. He disguises himself as a magician and attempts to get close to the King of Hyrule in an attempt to make a move on Zelda in order to steal the Triforce of Wisdom. He learns that the King knows what has become of the now-missing Triforce of Courage.
Sensing his impending death, the King tells Zelda about the Triforce of Courage. Ganondorf, as the magician, questions the King of Hyrule in an attempt to get the Triforce, but the King does not talk and falls victim to a fatal curse cast by Ganon.
The prince, Daphnes, who had expected to inherit everything, only inherits part of the Triforce of Wisdom. The magician prompts him to search for the missing Triforce of Courage. After learning that the King told Zelda something about the Triforce before he died, Daphnes confronts Zelda, but like the King she says nothing. In his rage, the magician places a sleeping curse on Zelda in order to pry the information from her dreams.
Daphnes tries to stop him, but to no avail. Zelda is put under an eternal sleep. Ganon's cover as a benevolent adviser to the king is blown, and he disappears, being "thought" to have died. Zelda is enshrined in the mountaintop palace north of Hyrule and Daphnes decrees that all princesses shall be named Zelda in remembrance of the tragedy.
Ganon's route to the Triforce of Wisdom is blocked, so he redirects his focus and attacks the sages who maintain the Master Sword's evil-repelling light. With the sword's magic gone, he now has full access to his power, and uses it to create a portal to escape the Sacred Realm. He launches a full-scale assault on Hyrule in order to find the missing Triforce, and the events of the Great Flood happen.
Consistency issues and conclusions
Naturally this theory is not perfect or infallible, like any other Zelda-related theory. It relies on accepting certain parallels as direct references and using the mechanics of the Zelda-verse as seen in certain titles to explain phenomenon in other titles. However, it maintains its basis in canonical interpretation, and so I must insist on its validity as a theory. I encourage readers however to question its veracity.
The most glaring problem that might be noticed goes thus: later in the Zelda II manual, we hear of someone who hid the Triforce of Courage in the Great Palace to await the time when a new king would come and left Power and Wisdom in the kingdom to be received. Reading the Zelda II manual as its own individual work, the most direct conclusion would be to consider the architect of these events to be the very same king who ruled Hyrule with the Triforce during the Sleeping Zelda story. Thus, it would seem that there is a problem with the early Sleeping Zelda theory in that it does not allot for the king to have hidden the Triforce of Courage in this way.
Of the three, I have left Power and Wisdom in the kingdom. But the Triforce of Courage I have hidden for a reason.
Examining the more recent games, however, we see that no game has provided any context for the Sleeping Zelda story to proceed as apparently originally intended. No game ends with anyone who could qualify as the "first" Zelda existing alongside a king who gains the entire Triforce and a prince to whom part of the Triforce could be handed down.
Many will appeal to A Link to the Past, saying that Link united the Triforce in the ending of that game, thus explaining how the Triforce came to be complete in Hyrule for The Adventure of Link's backstory. However, no substantial connection can be drawn between the Triforce and the royal family from that game, either in the case of the king or of the prince.
The only game to present a king possessing any of the Triforce to date has been The Wind Waker, and he does not seem to have left "part" of the Triforce for a prince--there does not seem to be any room for a "prince" to speak of at all as Tetra-Zelda is the only surviving member of the royal family.
It should be noted that while this theory would explain the names of almost every Princess Zelda in the series, it fails to explain the name of Twilight Princess's Zelda. However, unless the Sleeping Zelda was to predate Ocarina of Time, which most would probably argue cannot be the case, this is a necessary problem for at least one of the prongs of the "split timeline."
It would therefore seem it is impossible for a theory about the placement of the Sleeping Zelda to utilize the fullness of the original intent. All theories must either renounce the king's act of hiding the Triforce in the Great Palace as being part of the Sleeping Zelda story or they must deny that the Sleeping Zelda is the very first. Any theory regarding Zelda II's backstory that does not include Daphnes in The Wind Waker must assume that the king who hides the Triforce received it in an event that is as of yet unwitnessed and unreferenced.
This theory bases itself in the king's possession of the Triforce in The Wind Waker, both in part when he holds the shard of the Triforce of Wisdom and in full when he wishes on the Triforce in the game's ending. Thus, it provides substance to support its placement of the Sleeping Zelda myth, when a prince held the Triforce "in part" and of the hiding of the Triforce of Courage, when a king held the Triforce in full and left the parts to be used as a "light of hope."
Let a ray of hope shine on the future of the world!
Some may reject the Daphnes quote shown above as evidence of a connection between the King of Red Lions and the scroll writer. The original Japanese, they argue, does not use the phrase "ray of hope" at all, but instead says that the people should have a "bright future." Thus there is no evidence at all of a connection between Wind Waker's endgame scenario and The Legend of Zelda's story arc.
I counter-argue that Nintendo of America's localization team, the one responsible for bringing us the alternate language versions of the games, to use the words of their supervisor, Bill Trinen, "know and adhere to the timeline." If Nintendo of America's version indicates a more blatant connection between games, this is not without reason, despite discrepancies with the Japanese texts. For example, in Twilight Princess, Trinen stated that his team was trying to "maintain references to the Imprisoning War," references which in the Japanese version of the game were extremely watered-down but in the English version were fresh and intact. As head of localization, Trinen certainly has some wiggle room to apply his knowledge of the series to his translations of the game script, and that would be true of Wind Waker's ending as well.
Others will object to this theory's interpretation of the king's use of the Triforce to maintain peace. The story cannot refer to simply inheriting the divine blessing of the gods and thus keeping order and balance in so doing, these theorists say--it must involve the king actively using the physical Triforce's powers to ensure that providence is upheld. But poetic description of Hyrule's relationship to the Triforce is nothing new to the series--despite resting in the Sacred Realm, "another world" as described in A Link to the Past, the Hyrule of legend is the "land where the power of the gods is said to sleep." Hyrule's relationship to the Triforce has always been largely symbolic, and there is no reason why its monarchy's connections to the sacred relic cannot be also.
The creators have cited time and again, from Toru Osawa all the way to the mastermind, Eiji Aonuma, that the overarching chronology of the Zelda series operates through references and "pseudo-secrets" that will only be recognized by veteran players. Regardless of how the Sleeping Zelda story fits into the timeline and how traditional views depict the events, this theory seeks to assign it a greater position in the Zelda canon than as a spiritual origin story. What other theories pass off as meaningless homages to the classics this theory elevates as direct reference. It fills in the background of the plot of Zelda II with intricate connections to The Wind Waker's characters and uses these connections to flesh out the overarching story.
Categories: Bombers Articles, Races & People, Theory Articles
I be' glancing through the articles, have no time to read all of it at the moment.
"When the Hero of Time was called to embark on another journey and left the land of Hyrule, he was separated from the elements that made him a hero."
I don't recall that ever being said in The Wind Waker. I even looked though a text dump and still couldn't find any such quote. To me, it appears to be a reference to Majora's Mask, which doesn't fit well in the timeline.
@ Goron Moron
It's definitely in Wind Waker. In Japanese the quote also says that he "traveled through time" when he left Hyrule. This quote seems to have been altered somewhat to fit with the presumed timeline at the time; it's clear Bill Trinen thought there was a single timeline when he translated the game, as he cites "The Legend of the Fairy" as important evidence for TWW's placement. It seems like the split timeline was an afterthought.
Here's a link to a quote FAQ (ZeldaLegends isn't loading for me), if you're interested:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/gamecube/file/469050/23534
This line is spoken when the king tells Link about the Triforce of Courage.
i'd sleep with princess zelda
Great article Lex! You seemed to cover everything I wanted to talk about over AIM, so I'm just reconfirming the awesomeness of your article.
Great job as always.
~LOZ H~
Odd because I looked in that very text dump and even used the Find tool on this browser, and I still couldn't find anything.
Score one for the line timelinists, I guess...
Great job Lex. I pondered the small fragments I've seen you mention of this theory before, but hadn't comprehended how it fitted together as a whole. I see it as very plausible, especially seen it is focused off events that have occurred within the series, with not as much speculation as most sleeping Zelda stories I've heard. That said, you've definately led me to thoroughly reconsider my stance on the AoL backstory. Cheers.
Top notch work Lex. You have always presented the ideas mentioned in this theory strongly on theorising boards, and to see it all together in an article is amazing.
There is no doubt in my mind that Daphnes is the scroll writer when following an AT placement timeline now.
"Some may reject the Daphnes quote shown above as evidence of a connection between the King of Red Lions and the scroll writer. The original Japanese, they argue, does not use the phrase "ray of hope" at all, but instead says that the people should have a "bright future." Thus there is no evidence at all of a connection between Wind Waker's endgame scenario and The Legend of Zelda's story arc.
I counter-argue that Nintendo of America's localization team, the one responsible for bringing us the alternate language versions of the games, to use the words of their supervisor, Bill Trinen, "know and adhere to the timeline." If Nintendo of America's version indicates a more blatant connection between games, this is not without reason, despite discrepancies with the Japanese texts. For example, in Twilight Princess, Trinen stated that his team was trying to "maintain references to the Imprisoning War," references which in the Japanese version of the game were extremely watered-down but in the English version were fresh and intact. As head of localization, Trinen certainly has some wiggle room to apply his knowledge of the series to his translations of the game script, and that would be true of Wind Waker's ending as well."
I disagree. Why would localization use the wrong quote to make a timeline connection that can only be seen by the people who know the translated AoL manual? The NoA version says "You are the beacon of hope for Hyrule."" The only people who would see the "light of hope" quote would be the same people to see the correct translation of TWW. All-in-all just because they "know and adhere" to the timeline doesn't mean that they don't get things wrong. I agree it is better now that Bill Trinen is the guy but even they have made mistakes. Such as the Oocca creating the Hylians(/Hyrulians... don't remember the exact quote...).
There's clearly a naming tradition as shown in TP that isn't related to the AoL BS.
It's a very nice story I just don't think it is quite evidenced enough.
@Som: The wording parallel, despite AoL's localization, still works pretty solidly for AoL, as "beacon of hope" is more or less a more poetic and prophetic wording for "light of hope."
Note that for TP, when Ganondorf spoke to Zant, NoA localized his words "if you have a desire, I shall desire it, too" in words differing from the SNES ALttP English manual, even though it seems pretty clearly to be a use of parallel wording from ALttP.
It's obvious that they make mistakes (usually their description of the story is way off in a way that doesn't make sense or is completely different from the Japanese), but TWW's ending is not one such case. Even "bright future" and "ray of hope [shining] on the future" have more or less the same meaning. My argument is, simply, that NoA purposely added the wording they did to demonstrate a connection to AoL. They'd certainly be better poised to do so, given that they localized the game after it was already finished.
We know that even gameplay changes were made to the localized versions of the game to accommodate for Western audiences (involving the Triforce quest), so I don't see why NoA can't make meaningful changes to the script in light of post-development ideas.
Certainly a provocative piece, though unfortunately it's late at night so my mind's too muddled to piece everything together. One thing that confuses me is the timeline you're using in the various sections: when you talk about Wind Waker being the connection to the first Zelda, you make a reference to the quote about the whole "ray of light" thing.
Admittedly, it fits together nicely, but the rest of it doesn't. Tetra isn't petrified, Ganon is. Where is Ocarina of Time in relation to this? The game itself pretty clearly establishes it as a prequel, so what of the Princess Zelda there? Was she an errant ancestor that did not fall under the decree?
Your other ideas, while interesting, have similar timeline issues. LttP is supposedly after OoT (though it's been debated before), so again we have the inconsistent Zelda. While LttP does seem to make its own strong references, we still have the completely wrong ending: the Triforce is whole, Zelda's fine, and there's no prince.
I understand that the point here is to raise a provocative idea that connects various ideas together. The Zelda legend from AoL is actually one of my favorites, so I was really interested in this article when I saw it. But let's face it: none of the games really fit the bill, as much as we can try to stretch the meaning (ultimately, we have to deal with Zelda turning into, and remaining as, stone). Until we encounter anything like this, or at least a princess not named Zelda (don't say Tetra!), the story will always remain as a prior event.
Which, if you think about it, means that this legend is really, really old. If it predates Ocarina of Time, which is supposed to be the earliest game in Hyrule's history, and the most latest one is... Adventures of Link? I guess? Depends on Nintendo's mood or fans' personal opinions, but nevertheless, the year gap must be pretty big to span all those generations. Kinda makes me wonder how long ago from OoT that Hyrule was actually founded...
"Eiji Aonuma, that the overarching chronology of the Zelda series operates through references and "pseudo-secrets" that will only be recognized by veteran players"
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BlatantLies
Why in the name of god would you create a complicated background history so only 4 people would ever know it even existed, and have to life their lives contradicting each other in what such weird clues really meant? Is because they love us so much? Do timelines work in mysterious ways?
Don’t get me wrong, I find the theories here pretty impressive, but is nothing with out confirmation from the "word of god"
Next time some meets Eiji, ask him what the **** those gargoyles licking the Triforce in MM meant , or what the hell meant that the Sheikas eye was in Zants room or what the **** that gossip stone behind the deku tree meant when it said a Kokiri had let the forest before ( its not link, because link is a **** ing hylian)
If he comes with something slightly coherent, then I will believe. If not, do not attribute to genius what it might have been just sloppiness.
There might be of course, some sort of time line, but it got to be pretty half assed and mostly product of ret con. Or do you think that everything they have done in the last 20 years would fit perfectly because it was all planned in advance?
@Andrew:
Eiji has been more recently quoted as saying that the timeline is a "gift" to longtime fans of the series. I would say that their approach to the timeline is to create a sense of mystery that players will want to explore on their own, but to give clues here and there that they can piece together. It's highly possible that these pieces could fit in many different ways, especially given that we oftentimes see conflicting continuity, where some things match up but other things seem kind of wrong.
And I definitely think that the Gossip Stone is talking about Link, and that (being a "Gossip Stone") it just picked up what some Kokiri said about Link leaving and repeats it when you approach with the Mask of Truth.
impressive. alot of time was put into that, and it does make alot of sense. maybe ill re think my opinion of the timeline